quant best verbal not upto the mark

I dont think I need to review the the quant tests, because they are beyond words. Everyone has written about it and yes they are very good. They are a perfect guide to q51. But only if you time them. Doing untimed tests means you're just wasting them. But I'm disappionted with the verbal tests. The scores are not at all the right representation of your actual score (not even quant ) but atleast quant is like 2 level up. With verbal its not like that, I feel half of the questions are poor quality questions. They increase the level of difficulty by using subtle language to a next level. Even gmat uses subtle language but the level gmat club tests use is non sensical. The only thing I can here say is hire moderaters like bunuel and rework the verbal section and bring it at par with gmat prep or the og or go a level up, but dont use illogical things to make the test level difficult. Often in Rc and Cr there are two choices which are extremely close and other choice all are out of scope. These close choices ar so close that its like a 50-50 chance of getting a question right. The verbal section really needs a big revamp. And one thing is noticed is even the moderators are not standing up for it. Like by common sense there are two choices that are close to another level and both can be correct but even moderators are not saying a thing on them.