Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
All Reviews > [Tests] Experts' Global - 15 Full Mocks Reviews |
I took the Experts' Global Test series in 2019, a few months before my GMAT. I was surprised at how close their tests came to the actual GMAT.
I had exhausted all 6 GMAC practice tests and was looking for more practice. After trying out many online portals, I stumbled upon Expert's Global and decided to give their test series a try. I would always score in the range of 700-760 on the Experts' Global tests and ended up scoring a 720 on my final GMAT exam, testimony enough to how close their scoring algorithm is to the actual test.
The 15 test series was also very cost-effective. At just INR 3,000/- back then, it was a great value add to my preparation. Great job Experts' Global team!!
Expert Global's test series provided me great practice for my GMAT exam I and ended up scoring 740 (Q49 , V41) after 3 months of preparation.
I believe GMAT is all about mastering the test taking technique.Hence, my preparation strategy was fairly simple as I planned to take maximum number of practice tests before the actual GMAT exam. I required a test series which had a large number of practice tests and was reasonable. Expert's Global satisfied this criteria perfectly. Moreover, the practice tests were very similar to the actual GMAT exam and I faced no technical issues while taking these tests.
I really liked that, unlike other courses or tests, the Experts' global solutions videos are not long, almost every video is around two minutes. This feature is a big plus as It helped me learn to solve questions quickly during mocks.
Although the tests are not adaptive, questions are of mixed difficulty levels which make the mocks close to the official GMAT exam. The analytics provided helps you to analyze weak areas. The IR section is pretty elaborate and provides a lot of questions to practice.
In sum, the test series really helped me improve my GMAT score and I highly recommend this test series to all the GMAT test-takers.
Joined: Dec 24, 2019
Posts: 33
Kudos: 8
Verified GMAT Classic score:
700 Q48 V37 (Online)
The plethora of questions available in the mocks provided covers the variety and the difficulty to a large extent. The added advantage is that the mock webpage is almost the replica of the original exam itself so you get the look and feel of the exam beforehand.They also provide short video solutions along with the written explanations for the questions covered in the mock exam which helps in understanding where exactly we went wrong. It is also offered at a reasonable price. Go ahead and start practicing the full length mocks from Experts' Global. The collection of 15 tests also in a way train your brain to sit and concentrate for 4 hours so that on the exam day you are well prepared.
Hello everyone!
I bought the 15 Full Mocks to practice after taking the GMAT twice. I scored 620 and 630 in those attempts (Q43,44 - V32-33).
I managed to do 6 Mocks when I studied for 3 months to take my 3rd attempt. My scores were
680 (Q47)
690 (Q48)
670 (Q46)
700 (Q49)
710 (Q49)
680 (Q48)
I was VERY confident that my quant would be at least Q46, in the real exam, however I got a Q45 (!!!!!), I was devasted!!!! Honestly, I felt the Mocks were kinda different from real gmat questions, but I tought that because I had studied with Kaplan (TERRIBLE) and by myself, I taught that the questions were Ok in the end.
I managed to get 660 in my score, but I did not think that it is so good as 5 star review.
Experts’ Global provides greatest value for your money. There are 15 mock tests 1 is free, 14 costs $50 only. These tests are very much representative of an actual GMAT exam.
Timing in these tests tells how you manage your time in actual GMAT.
Quant: The closest quant section I have taken ever, after Official GMAT Prep tests. You can identify your weak areas in math, as Experts’ Global has detailed analytics of your performance. Each question has both written and video explanations.
Verbal: SC, CR and RC are very similar to official questions. However, CR has some old type questions that do not appear on GMAT frequently, same applies for RC. RC passages are longer than actual GMAT. But, the length of the passages are compensated by the difference in the difficulty of questions from official RC. Overall, Verbal is good.
REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by score report [?]
Initially,I started off with manhattan and veritas mocks.I scored between 650 and 670,with the least being 620.Then, I started to attempt expert global mocks.I found the quant and IR sections of the product to be best in the lot.However,in case of verbal,I found that the RC was bit off and often lengthy and different from those of gmac tests. I scored an average of 670 in mocks,with 630 being the least and 730 being the highest.
I took the original exam at the test center and scored a 630(Q47,V29).My quant score was representative of the average scores in expert global mocks but my verbal score deviated from the average score in the expert global mocks-it was 35 on average.
All in all, considering that no test prep company can simulate the algorithm of actual gmat test, expert global mocks are the best in terms of value and price, especailly for quant.
These tests are not adaptive and it is the best thing about them.You will have to answer 700 level questions just like a test taker who scores a 700+ score on test day.Your weak areas will be displayed on the dashboard as soon as you login.They pay special attention to smaller topics as well such as -subjunctive mood, there are text + video explanations
.Its the only test series with 15 dedicated IR sections.Its a must have for any GMAT aspirant.
Give all 15 tests before your actual test and you WILL have answered easy AND tough questions from nearly every concept.
Experts' Global 15 full length mocks are impressively close to the real GMAT in terms of UI, difficulty level and scores . A video solution is provided for each and every question in the mocks.
A detailed analysis and diagnostic report is generated at the end of the test and one should pay utmost attention to the analysis provided by Experts Global simulation software. The overall and sectional score estimates are fairly close to the real GMAT. There is a large pool of questions for both Quant and Verbal, I hardly saw any repeated questions in the 15 mocks.
I highly recommend this test series to all the GMAT aspirants.
Firstly, i would like to say that the 15 mock tests provided by Experts Global is really good both subject wise and money wise.
All 15 tests provided cost only 50$ which is pretty reasonable.
The quality of questions too is decent but can be improved. The one thing i really like about their tests is the video explanations. These explanations help to understand the concepts better
However, one thing that can be done to improve the tests even more if if the tests can be written again. The option of writing tests again is not available. Its a one time thing only.
Hello,
Thank you for your review and the kind words.
Regarding not having the option of writing a test again-
To not have the option of "repeating a test" is a well-deliberated call we took owing to our experience of imparting firsthand training to thousands of GMAT aspirants. When you "repeat" a test, the (bound to be there) residual memory of the questions makes the test look easier and seem more comfortable. On the real GMAT, every question you see will have a "brand new" feel and this difference can mean a difference of several points. It is important that every question you attempt on a mock is a "never-seen-before", for the correct representation of one's level.
We hope that you and all serious test-takers will appreciate the thinking here. We have anyway solved the bigger problem by having a set of 15 mocks so that one doesn't feel the need for "repeating" on the first place.
Best wishes,
Experts' Global team
Hi Vibhav,
Thanks for your review, particularly for understanding our rationale behind keeping the test non-adaptive: to help students practice on a difficulty they are likely to see when they score 700+. We have made the "scoring" adaptive rather than the "ordering" adaptive so that a student gets to know one's true level while still practicing on a 700+ level test.
Congrats on your success. Thank you for remembering us :)